Author summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Advance results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 1,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (3,244 of 8,323 authors). This Michigan Advance is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Michigan Advance
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠61%Michigan Advance (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,656
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Michigan Advance attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Michigan Advance vs sitewide
Michigan Advance attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos