Author summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video1,261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Ellis results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 972 hits. Analysis detected 4,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (3,576 of 8,355 authors). This Megan Ellis is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Megan Ellis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠58%Megan Ellis (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,044
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Megan Ellis attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Megan Ellis vs sitewide
Megan Ellis attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos