BS Summary: These Megan Cerullo results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 254 hits. Analysis detected 1,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,459 of 4,642 authors). This Megan Cerullo is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Megan Cerullo
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Megan Cerullo attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Megan Cerullo vs All Other Publications
Megan Cerullo attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.