Author summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maureen Mullarkey results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 706 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (1,591 of 6,070 authors). This Maureen Mullarkey is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Maureen Mullarkey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠74%Maureen Mullarkey (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Maureen Mullarkey attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Maureen Mullarkey vs sitewide
Maureen Mullarkey attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos