Author summary
47%1 analyzed article/video1,097 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maura Fox results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 517 hits. Analysis detected 2,828 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 59% (3,558 of 8,637 authors). This Maura Fox is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Maura Fox
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
59%Maura Fox (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,388
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos