Author summary
38%1 analyzed article/video386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthias Inverardi results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 903 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (3,016 of 9,471 authors). This Matthias Inverardi is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Matthias Inverardi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
69%Matthias Inverardi (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,544
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

68% percentile
025507510068.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 13.3%13.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 13.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Tu Quoque: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos