Author summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Yim results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 1,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,660 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (2,088 of 8,318 authors). This Matthew Yim is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Matthew Yim
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠75%Matthew Yim (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,660
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Matthew Yim attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Matthew Yim vs sitewide
Matthew Yim attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos