Author summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Cupelli results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 521 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (3,016 of 6,244 authors). This Matthew Cupelli is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Matthew Cupelli
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠52%Matthew Cupelli (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,080
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Matthew Cupelli attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Matthew Cupelli vs sitewide
Matthew Cupelli attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos