Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matthew Cebul results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,185 hits. Analysis detected 7,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 5,246 authors). This Matthew Cebul is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Matthew Cebul
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Matthew Cebul attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Matthew Cebul vs sitewide
Matthew Cebul attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.