Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matthew Blake results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 537 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,139 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,212 authors). This Matthew Blake is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Matthew Blake
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Matthew Blake (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 5,139
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos