Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Martin Di Caro results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Straw Man , and Confirmation Bias , with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 164 hits . Analysis detected 1,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,706 authors). This Martin Di Caro is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Martin Di Caro
Author details
Total words: 5,444
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Tu Quoque: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% No True Scotsman: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst