Author summary
34%1 analyzed article/video1,395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maia McDonald results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 589 hits. Analysis detected 3,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,185 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,324 of 5,694 authors). This Maia McDonald is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Maia McDonald
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Maia McDonald attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Maia McDonald vs sitewide
Maia McDonald attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.