Author summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video1,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madyline Swearing results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 467 hits. Analysis detected 2,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,321 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (2,264 of 5,306 authors). This Madyline Swearing is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Madyline Swearing
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠58%Madyline Swearing (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,321
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Madyline Swearing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Madyline Swearing vs sitewide
Madyline Swearing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos