Author summary
ā 83%1 analyzed article/video1,548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Hallam results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,057 hits. Analysis detected 8,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ā 68% (1,641 of 5,133 authors). This Luke Hallam is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Luke Hallam
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
ā 1%Joe Rennison1%
ā 68%Luke Hallam (selected)4%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,192
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Luke Hallam attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Luke Hallam vs sitewide
Luke Hallam attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos