BS Summary: These Luke Barr results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 342 hits. Analysis detected 1,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (2,859 of 4,621 authors). This Luke Barr is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Luke Barr
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠39%Luke Barr (selected)3%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 3,416
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Luke Barr attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Luke Barr vs All Other Publications
Luke Barr attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.