Author summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis E. Romero results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 566 hits. Analysis detected 3,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,833 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (575 of 5,313 authors). This Luis E. Romero is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Luis E. Romero
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠90%Luis E. Romero (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,833
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Luis E. Romero attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Luis E. Romero vs sitewide
Luis E. Romero attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos