Author summary
⁠4%2 analyzed articles/videos208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Gimbert results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Blind-Spot Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 246 faulty-reasoning hits from 624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (2,048 of 5,694 authors). This Lindsey Gimbert is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Lindsey Gimbert
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠64%Lindsey Gimbert (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 624
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Lindsey Gimbert attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Lindsey Gimbert vs sitewide
Lindsey Gimbert attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos