Author summary
20%1 analyzed article/video594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liam Hibbert Center Square Contributor results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 1,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,149 of 9,471 authors). This Liam Hibbert Center Square Contributor is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Liam Hibbert Center Square Contributor
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
67%Liam Hibbert Center Square Contributor (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.9%6.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos