Author summary
20% 1 analyzed article/video 594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liam Hibbert Center Square Contributor results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 168 hits . Analysis detected 1,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,149 of 9,471 authors). This Liam Hibbert Center Square Contributor is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Liam Hibbert Center Square Contributor
Author details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst