Author summary
62%1 analyzed article/video235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leor Galil results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 346 hits. Analysis detected 1,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 95% (471 of 8,559 authors). This Leor Galil is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Leor Galil
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
95%Leor Galil (selected)9%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 940
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

95% percentile
025507510094.5% percentile
8.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles940 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.8%36.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 27.9%27.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.7%2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.5%3.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 27.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos