Author summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelsey Yarzab Yates results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 532 hits . Analysis detected 3,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,850 of 9,302 authors). This Kelsey Yarzab Yates is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Kelsey Yarzab Yates
Author details
Total words: 2,508
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.2% 21.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.6% 8.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.4% 12.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst