Author summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Mulvaney results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 1,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (2,645 of 7,631 authors). This Katie Mulvaney is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Katie Mulvaney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%T. Christian Miller1%
⁠0%Ken Armstrong1%
⁠1%Brenna Ehrlich1%
⁠66%Katie Mulvaney (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,480
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Katie Mulvaney attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Katie Mulvaney vs sitewide
Katie Mulvaney attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos