Author summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video1,813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathryn Stoner results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 535 hits. Analysis detected 4,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (5,837 of 9,471 authors). This Kathryn Stoner is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Kathryn Stoner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠39%Kathryn Stoner (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,252
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510038.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos