Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathryn Krawczyk results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 235 hits . Analysis detected 2,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,915 of 9,471 authors). This Kathryn Krawczyk is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. Kathryn Krawczyk
Author details
Total words: 2,532
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst