Author summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video2,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 688 hits. Analysis detected 4,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (3,979 of 4,860 authors). This Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠19%Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination (selected)2%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,296
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination vs sitewide
Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos