Author summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video1,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kat Bryant Knudson results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 425 hits. Analysis detected 3,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (3,519 of 8,323 authors). This Kat Bryant Knudson is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Kat Bryant Knudson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠58%Kat Bryant Knudson (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,772
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Kat Bryant Knudson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Kat Bryant Knudson vs sitewide
Kat Bryant Knudson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos