Author summary
41%1 analyzed article/video313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen James Sloan results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 562 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,591 of 8,572 authors). This Karen James Sloan is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Karen James Sloan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
82%Karen James Sloan (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,252
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.3%2.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 2.3%2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 1.7%1.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos