Author summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 1,605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Appleby results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 432 hits . Analysis detected 3,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (4,945 of 8,701 authors). This Julie Appleby is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Julie Appleby
Author details
Total words: 6,420
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst