Author summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 1,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julian E. Zelizer results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 532 hits . Analysis detected 4,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 56% (3,854 of 8,708 authors). This Julian E. Zelizer is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group. Julian E. Zelizer
Author details
Total words: 6,300
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst