Author summary
53%1 analyzed article/video1,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julian E. Zelizer results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 4,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 56% (3,854 of 8,708 authors). This Julian E. Zelizer is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Julian E. Zelizer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
56%Julian E. Zelizer (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,300
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.1%7.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos