Author summary
96%1 analyzed article/video1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia S. Beck results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 896 hits. Analysis detected 5,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,969 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,212 of 5,313 authors). This Julia S. Beck is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Julia S. Beck
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Julia S. Beck attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Julia S. Beck vs sitewide
Julia S. Beck attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.