Author summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video1,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Ford Cotto results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 848 hits. Analysis detected 7,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,861 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (1,242 of 6,067 authors). This Joseph Ford Cotto is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Joseph Ford Cotto
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠80%Joseph Ford Cotto (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,861
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Joseph Ford Cotto attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Joseph Ford Cotto vs sitewide
Joseph Ford Cotto attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos