Author summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan M. Pitts results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 315 faulty-reasoning hits from 312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (403 of 4,860 authors). This Jonathan M. Pitts is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Jonathan M. Pitts
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠92%Jonathan M. Pitts (selected)9%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 312
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jonathan M. Pitts attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jonathan M. Pitts vs sitewide
Jonathan M. Pitts attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos