Author summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Fjeld results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 861 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (1,235 of 5,222 authors). This Jonathan Fjeld is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Jonathan Fjeld
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠77%Jonathan Fjeld (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,204
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jonathan Fjeld attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jonathan Fjeld vs sitewide
Jonathan Fjeld attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos