Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jon Decker results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 177 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,130 authors). This Jon Decker is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jon Decker
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jon Decker attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jon Decker vs sitewide
Jon Decker attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.