Author summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video1,124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Ingold results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 517 hits. Analysis detected 3,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (2,662 of 5,120 authors). This John Ingold is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
John Ingold
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠48%John Ingold (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,496
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
John Ingold attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
John Ingold vs sitewide
John Ingold attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos