Author summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video1,605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Ryan results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 695 hits. Analysis detected 2,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (6,920 of 9,471 authors). This Jim Ryan is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Jim Ryan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠27%Jim Ryan (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,420
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos