Author summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jillian Kramer results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 731 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,215 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (1,429 of 6,416 authors). This Jillian Kramer is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Jillian Kramer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠78%Jillian Kramer (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,215
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jillian Kramer attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jillian Kramer vs sitewide
Jillian Kramer attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos