Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jill Keppeler results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 1,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 5,194 authors). This Jill Keppeler is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jill Keppeler
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jill Keppeler attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jill Keppeler vs sitewide
Jill Keppeler attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.