Author summary
70%1 analyzed article/video769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Goldsmith results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 3,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,201 of 5,157 authors). This Jill Goldsmith is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Jill Goldsmith
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jill Goldsmith attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jill Goldsmith vs sitewide
Jill Goldsmith attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.