Author summary
77% 1 analyzed article/video 615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremy Gruber results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Begging the Question , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 421 hits . Analysis detected 2,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,115 of 8,863 authors). This Jeremy Gruber is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. Jeremy Gruber
Author details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst