Author summary
59% 2 analyzed articles/videos 275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jay Barmann results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 211 hits . Analysis detected 1,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,215 of 9,538 authors). This Jay Barmann is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Jay Barmann
Author details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst