Author summary
â 63% 1 analyzed article/video 657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Chun results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 232 hits . Analysis detected 1,428 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 42% (5,542 of 9,471 authors). This Jason Chun is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Jason Chun
Author details
Total words: 2,628
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.8% 8.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Tu Quoque: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst