Author summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 1,903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarryd Bartle results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Straw Man , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,601 hits . Analysis detected 6,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,703 of 9,471 authors). This Jarryd Bartle is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Jarryd Bartle
Author details
Total words: 7,612
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.0% 21.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst