Author summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Miller results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 309 hits. Analysis detected 1,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (2,794 of 8,317 authors). This Jane Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Jane Miller
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠67%Jane Miller (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,444
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jane Miller attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jane Miller vs sitewide
Jane Miller attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos