Author summary
74%1 analyzed article/video720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Martin Charlton results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 741 hits. Analysis detected 3,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,506 of 8,345 authors). This James Martin Charlton is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
James Martin Charlton
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
James Martin Charlton attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
James Martin Charlton vs sitewide
James Martin Charlton attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.