Author summary
14%1 analyzed article/video656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Jackson results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 1,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,370 of 8,970 authors). This James Jackson is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
James Jackson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
52%James Jackson (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,624
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510051.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos