Author summary
⁠24%1 analyzed article/video599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Francis Whitehead results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 916 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (3,203 of 8,357 authors). This James Francis Whitehead is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
James Francis Whitehead
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠62%James Francis Whitehead (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,396
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
James Francis Whitehead attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
James Francis Whitehead vs sitewide
James Francis Whitehead attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos