Author summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Faris results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 1,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (3,417 of 4,909 authors). This James Faris is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
James Faris
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠31%James Faris (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,396
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
James Faris attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
James Faris vs sitewide
James Faris attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos