Author summary
88%1 analyzed article/video2,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jakob McWhinney results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,186 hits. Analysis detected 5,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (2,927 of 6,070 authors). This Jakob McWhinney is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Jakob McWhinney
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jakob McWhinney attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jakob McWhinney vs sitewide
Jakob McWhinney attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.