Author summary
45%1 analyzed article/video2,274 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Bacharach results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 616 hits. Analysis detected 5,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 23% (6,745 of 8,732 authors). This Jacob Bacharach is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Jacob Bacharach
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
23%Jacob Bacharach (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,096
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510022.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos