Author summary
ā 94% 1 analyzed article/video 1,607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ismail Nofal results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 1,090 hits . Analysis detected 6,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ā 80% (1,913 of 9,471 authors). This Ismail Nofal is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Ismail Nofal
Author details
Total words: 6,428
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.8% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.7%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst